Back in 2011, Brian Logan wrote in the Guardian about a couple who appeared to be on a mission to hit every West End theatre… and have sex in the stalls. Actors Alex Kingston and Rob Lowe had reported seeing the couple from the stage, “getting [their] kicks in the front row”. Quite why the couple chose to attempt this is still unknown – perhaps it was a dare, or attempting to ‘do it in public’ with the lights down, or perhaps they just really LOVE theatre. Either way, it was a bizarre, confusing, but nevertheless impressive feat to endeavour.
This raised the question of the ‘sexiness’ of theatre, which has (surprisingly) still a large number of people thinking it stuffy, old-fashioned, and uncool. But the ever more daring nature of theatre shows is highlighting the fact that two people in front of you on a stage is far more thrilling than watching a glass box. The stage, as opposed to the screen, isn’t interested in beautiful faces or perfect bodies – it highlights the physicality of relationships, the eroticism of voice, and the presence of people in front of one another.
In Spring Awakening, for example, the hayloft scene between under-age Wendla and Melchior seems even more intimate by the fact that there are audience members either side of them. Their embrace, both experimental and innocent, is private, yet completely exposed to all of us who sit on our plush seats. Whereas film can cleverly create the illusion of voyeurism with shadows and scenes shot through window frames, the theatre is the ultimate peep-show, viewed through a large proscenium arch. We the audience are given free gaze over everything and everybody.
Hair: The American Tribal Love-Rock Musical came from the 1960s hippie culture, embracing sexual revolution, drug experimentation, and an increasing resistance to the Vietnam War. Containing scenes of drug abuse, sexual freedom, and racially equal casting, it caused much controversy during its first few productions. Indeed, just before the interval, the cast flood the stage with a powerful rendition of “Where Do I Go?”, but completely naked. Men and women, all shapes and sizes, stand strong on stage with nothing to hide – somehow, seeing that on a film would not have had the impact it does when it’s right in front of your eyes. After getting over the initial unexpected nature of the scene, it becomes powerful, inspiring, and a little intimidating. Continue reading


I’m not a dancer. I know little about the technicality of dance and what can be deemed ‘good’ or ‘bad. I can, however, express my appreciation for a show, the form of people moving across a stage, and the impression I’m left with upon leaving the theatre.
imitate its West End predecessor but rather re-imagine Rachel Wagstaff’s stage version of the book. Despite its strong cast and moving story, I found nevertheless that I left the theatre without a feeling of awe and satisfaction, but rather that something more could have been brought out. It was a good play, and a solid production, yet it lacked the spark that has made other adaptations so inspiring.